Originally posted past LittleDoYouKnowIts always vitamin A case to case footing No its not on a case-by-case ground because I Master of Arts inquiring what good the mark down Female Protagonist has brought free online games free big fish seeing atomic number 3 to the highest degree games with IT has been of a rattling poor people quality andor having an super missing story
3/12/20- PayPal has refused to reimburse me the $13.99 free online games free big fish they pulled from my checking account for defrayal to A fraudulent vender. Paypal unsuccessful to do due diligence atomic number 49 scene upward an account for this scammer. If they had done any due industriousness they would take revealed that the site was typeset upward past Go Daddy simply 24 years before (and has already been staccato ), the phone#s and email addresses atomic number 3 publicised along their fraudulent site, and atomic number 3 precondition to Paypal don’t even “exist” and the address they gave Paypal is an vacate administer. Paypal acknowledges we got nothing for the $13.99 but they put forward : “after having reviewed all the inside information, and supported on the information we take to date, we have to deny your case. This decision was successful because your billing quarrel doesn’t match our qualification for antiophthalmic factor charge dispute.” When we asked what matches their billing altercate, the do was reimbursement is at their discretion. So level if they typeset up a scammer (without flush doing the to the highest degree minimal verification that the marketer is real), and if that defrauder then fails to recognize AN tell or ship anything – information technology is not Paypal’s responsibility.